Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem aspval2

Description: The algebraic closure is the ring closure when the generating set is expanded to include all scalars.EDITORIAL : In light of this, is AlgSpan independently needed? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses aspval2.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( AlgSpan ‘ 𝑊 )
aspval2.c ⊢ 𝐶 = ( algSc ‘ 𝑊 )
aspval2.r ⊢ 𝑅 = ( mrCls ‘ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) )
aspval2.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Base ‘ 𝑊 )
Assertion aspval2 ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑆 ) = ( 𝑅 ‘ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 aspval2.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( AlgSpan ‘ 𝑊 )
2 aspval2.c ⊢ 𝐶 = ( algSc ‘ 𝑊 )
3 aspval2.r ⊢ 𝑅 = ( mrCls ‘ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) )
4 aspval2.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Base ‘ 𝑊 )
5 elin ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) )
6 5 anbi1i ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) )
7 anass ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ) )
8 6 7 bitri ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ) )
9 eqid ⊢ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) = ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 )
10 2 9 issubassa2 ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ↔ ran 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ) )
11 10 anbi1d ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ) → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( ran 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ) )
12 unss ⊢ ( ( ran 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 )
13 11 12 bitrdi ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ) → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 ) )
14 13 pm5.32da ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 ) ) )
15 8 14 bitrid ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 ) ) )
16 15 abbidv ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 ) } )
17 16 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 ) } )
18 df-rab ⊢ { 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 ) }
19 df-rab ⊢ { 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∣ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 ) }
20 17 18 19 3eqtr4g ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → { 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 } = { 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∣ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 } )
21 20 inteqd ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ∩ { 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 } = ∩ { 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∣ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 } )
22 1 4 9 aspval ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑆 ) = ∩ { 𝑥 ∈ ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∩ ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ∣ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑥 } )
23 assaring ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → 𝑊 ∈ Ring )
24 4 subrgmre ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ Ring → ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∈ ( Moore ‘ 𝑉 ) )
25 23 24 syl ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∈ ( Moore ‘ 𝑉 ) )
26 eqid ⊢ ( Scalar ‘ 𝑊 ) = ( Scalar ‘ 𝑊 )
27 assalmod ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → 𝑊 ∈ LMod )
28 eqid ⊢ ( Base ‘ ( Scalar ‘ 𝑊 ) ) = ( Base ‘ ( Scalar ‘ 𝑊 ) )
29 2 26 23 27 28 4 asclf ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → 𝐶 : ( Base ‘ ( Scalar ‘ 𝑊 ) ) ⟶ 𝑉 )
30 29 frnd ⊢ ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg → ran 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑉 )
31 30 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ran 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑉 )
32 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 )
33 31 32 unssd ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑉 )
34 3 mrcval ⊢ ( ( ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∈ ( Moore ‘ 𝑉 ) ∧ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ( 𝑅 ‘ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ) = ∩ { 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∣ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 } )
35 25 33 34 syl2an2r ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ( 𝑅 ‘ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ) = ∩ { 𝑥 ∈ ( SubRing ‘ 𝑊 ) ∣ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝑥 } )
36 21 22 35 3eqtr4d ⊢ ( ( 𝑊 ∈ AssAlg ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑉 ) → ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑆 ) = ( 𝑅 ‘ ( ran 𝐶 ∪ 𝑆 ) ) )