Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem mh-inf3sn

Description: Version of inf3 for the set of Zermelo ordinals (/) , { (/) } , { { (/) } } , { { { (/) } } } , etc., where the successor of y is { y } . Unlike inf3 , the proof does not require ax-reg , since the singleton properties snnz and sneqr are sufficient to guarantee that all elements of the sequence are distinct. (Contributed by Matthew House, 13-Apr-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis mh-inf3sn.1 ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 )
Assertion mh-inf3sn ω ∈ V

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 mh-inf3sn.1 ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 )
2 simpr ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 )
3 vex ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
4 3 sneqr ⊢ ( { 𝑦 } = { 𝑧 } → 𝑦 = 𝑧 )
5 4 rgen2w ⊢ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ( { 𝑦 } = { 𝑧 } → 𝑦 = 𝑧 )
6 eqid ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) = ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } )
7 sneq ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑧 → { 𝑦 } = { 𝑧 } )
8 6 7 f1mpt ⊢ ( ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) : 𝑥 –1-1→ 𝑥 ↔ ( ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ( { 𝑦 } = { 𝑧 } → 𝑦 = 𝑧 ) ) )
9 2 5 8 sylanblrc ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) : 𝑥 –1-1→ 𝑥 )
10 simpl ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∅ ∈ 𝑥 )
11 snnzg ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → { 𝑦 } ≠ ∅ )
12 11 necomd ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∅ ≠ { 𝑦 } )
13 12 neneqd ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ ∅ = { 𝑦 } )
14 13 nrex ⊢ ¬ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∅ = { 𝑦 }
15 vsnex ⊢ { 𝑦 } ∈ V
16 6 15 elrnmpti ⊢ ( ∅ ∈ ran ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∅ = { 𝑦 } )
17 14 16 mtbir ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ran ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } )
18 17 a1i ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ¬ ∅ ∈ ran ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) )
19 10 18 eldifd ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ∅ ∈ ( 𝑥 ∖ ran ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) ) )
20 9 19 mh-inf3f1 ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ( rec ( ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) , ∅ ) ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1→ 𝑥 )
21 vex ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
22 f1dmex ⊢ ( ( ( rec ( ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ { 𝑦 } ) , ∅ ) ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1→ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V ) → ω ∈ V )
23 20 21 22 sylancl ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 { 𝑦 } ∈ 𝑥 ) → ω ∈ V )
24 23 1 exlimiiv ⊢ ω ∈ V