Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem upwlkbprop

Description: Basic properties of a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017) (Revised by AV, 29-Dec-2020)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses upwlksfval.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
upwlksfval.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
Assertion upwlkbprop ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 upwlksfval.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
2 upwlksfval.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
3 1 2 upwlksfval ⊢ ( 𝐺 ∈ V → ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) = { ⟨ 𝑓 , 𝑝 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝 : ( 0 ... ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) ) ⟶ 𝑉 ∧ ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) ) ( 𝐼 ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) ) = { ( 𝑝 ‘ 𝑘 ) , ( 𝑝 ‘ ( 𝑘 + 1 ) ) } ) } )
4 3 breqd ⊢ ( 𝐺 ∈ V → ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ↔ 𝐹 { ⟨ 𝑓 , 𝑝 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝 : ( 0 ... ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) ) ⟶ 𝑉 ∧ ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) ) ( 𝐼 ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) ) = { ( 𝑝 ‘ 𝑘 ) , ( 𝑝 ‘ ( 𝑘 + 1 ) ) } ) } 𝑃 ) )
5 brabv ⊢ ( 𝐹 { ⟨ 𝑓 , 𝑝 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝 : ( 0 ... ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) ) ⟶ 𝑉 ∧ ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) ) ( 𝐼 ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) ) = { ( 𝑝 ‘ 𝑘 ) , ( 𝑝 ‘ ( 𝑘 + 1 ) ) } ) } 𝑃 → ( 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) )
6 4 5 biimtrdi ⊢ ( 𝐺 ∈ V → ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → ( 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ) )
7 6 imdistani ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ) → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ) )
8 3anass ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ↔ ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ) )
9 7 8 sylibr ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ) → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) )
10 9 ex ⊢ ( 𝐺 ∈ V → ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ) )
11 fvprc ⊢ ( ¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) = ∅ )
12 breq ⊢ ( ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) = ∅ → ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ↔ 𝐹 ∅ 𝑃 ) )
13 br0 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹 ∅ 𝑃
14 13 pm2.21i ⊢ ( 𝐹 ∅ 𝑃 → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) )
15 12 14 biimtrdi ⊢ ( ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) = ∅ → ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ) )
16 11 15 syl ⊢ ( ¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) ) )
17 10 16 pm2.61i ⊢ ( 𝐹 ( UPWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V ) )