Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem noseqinds

Description: Induction schema for surreal sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses noseq.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 = ( rec ( ( 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ( 𝑥 +s 1s ) ) , 𝐴 ) “ ω ) )
noseq.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
noseqinds.3 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
noseqinds.4 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃 ) )
noseqinds.5 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜏 ) )
noseqinds.6 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐵 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜂 ) )
noseqinds.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝜒 )
noseqinds.8 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝜃 → 𝜏 ) )
Assertion noseqinds ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝜂 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 noseq.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 = ( rec ( ( 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ( 𝑥 +s 1s ) ) , 𝐴 ) “ ω ) )
2 noseq.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3 noseqinds.3 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
4 noseqinds.4 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃 ) )
5 noseqinds.5 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜏 ) )
6 noseqinds.6 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐵 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜂 ) )
7 noseqinds.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝜒 )
8 noseqinds.8 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝜃 → 𝜏 ) )
9 1 2 noseq0 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑍 )
10 3 9 7 elrabd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } )
11 1 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝑍 = ( rec ( ( 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ( 𝑥 +s 1s ) ) , 𝐴 ) “ ω ) )
12 2 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝐴 ∈ No )
13 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 )
14 11 12 13 noseqp1 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ 𝑍 )
15 8 14 jctild ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝜃 → ( ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜏 ) ) )
16 15 expimpd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜃 ) → ( ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜏 ) ) )
17 4 elrab ⊢ ( 𝑧 ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } ↔ ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜃 ) )
18 5 elrab ⊢ ( ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } ↔ ( ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜏 ) )
19 16 17 18 3imtr4g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑧 ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } → ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } ) )
20 19 imp ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } ) → ( 𝑧 +s 1s ) ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } )
21 1 2 10 20 noseqind ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ⊆ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } )
22 21 sselda ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝐵 ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } )
23 6 elrab ⊢ ( 𝐵 ∈ { 𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ 𝜓 } ↔ ( 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜂 ) )
24 22 23 sylib ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝜂 ) )
25 24 simprd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝜂 )