Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rpnnen1lem4

Description: Lemma for rpnnen1 . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rpnnen1lem.1 ⊢ 𝑇 = { 𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ ( 𝑛 / 𝑘 ) < 𝑥 }
rpnnen1lem.2 ⊢ 𝐹 = ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ( 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ( sup ( 𝑇 , ℝ , < ) / 𝑘 ) ) )
rpnnen1lem.n ⊢ ℕ ∈ V
rpnnen1lem.q ⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Assertion rpnnen1lem4 ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup ( ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) , ℝ , < ) ∈ ℝ )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rpnnen1lem.1 ⊢ 𝑇 = { 𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ ( 𝑛 / 𝑘 ) < 𝑥 }
2 rpnnen1lem.2 ⊢ 𝐹 = ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ( 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ ( sup ( 𝑇 , ℝ , < ) / 𝑘 ) ) )
3 rpnnen1lem.n ⊢ ℕ ∈ V
4 rpnnen1lem.q ⊢ ℚ ∈ V
5 1 2 3 4 rpnnen1lem1 ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ ( ℚ ↑m ℕ ) )
6 4 3 elmap ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ ( ℚ ↑m ℕ ) ↔ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ )
7 5 6 sylib ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ )
8 frn ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ → ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ ℚ )
9 qssre ⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℝ
10 8 9 sstrdi ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ → ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ ℝ )
11 7 10 syl ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ ℝ )
12 1nn ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
13 12 ne0ii ⊢ ℕ ≠ ∅
14 fdm ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ → dom ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ℕ )
15 14 neeq1d ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ → ( dom ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ ↔ ℕ ≠ ∅ ) )
16 13 15 mpbiri ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ → dom ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ )
17 dm0rn0 ⊢ ( dom ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ∅ ↔ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ∅ )
18 17 necon3bii ⊢ ( dom ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ ↔ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ )
19 16 18 sylib ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) : ℕ ⟶ ℚ → ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ )
20 7 19 syl ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ )
21 1 2 3 4 rpnnen1lem3 ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥 )
22 breq2 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ( 𝑛 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥 ) )
23 22 ralbidv ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ( ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥 ) )
24 23 rspcev ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑥 ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑦 )
25 21 24 mpdan ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑦 )
26 suprcl ⊢ ( ( ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ ℝ ∧ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) 𝑛 ≤ 𝑦 ) → sup ( ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) , ℝ , < ) ∈ ℝ )
27 11 20 25 26 syl3anc ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup ( ran ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑥 ) , ℝ , < ) ∈ ℝ )