Description: Lemma for elsetrecs . Any element of setrecs ( F ) is generated
by some subset of setrecs ( F ) . This is much weaker than
setrec2v . To see why this lemma also requires setrec1 , consider
what would happen if we replaced B with { A } . The antecedent
would still hold, but the consequent would fail in general. Consider
dispensing with the deduction form. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 11-Jul-2021)(New usage is discouraged.)