Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem npomex

Description: A simplifying observation, and an indication of why any attempt to develop a theory of the real numbers without the Axiom of Infinity is doomed to failure: since every member of P. is an infinite set, the negation of Infinity implies that P. , and hence RR , is empty. (Note that this proof, which used the fact that Dedekind cuts have no maximum, could just as well have used that they have no minimum, since they are downward-closed by prcdnq and nsmallnq ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-May-2013) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion npomex ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → ω ∈ V

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 elex ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → A ∈ V
2 prnmax ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 ∧ x ∈ A → ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
3 2 ralrimiva ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → ∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
4 prpssnq ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → A ⊂ 𝑸
5 4 pssssd ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → A ⊆ 𝑸
6 ltsonq ⊢ < 𝑸 Or 𝑸
7 soss ⊢ A ⊆ 𝑸 → < 𝑸 Or 𝑸 → < 𝑸 Or A
8 5 6 7 mpisyl ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → < 𝑸 Or A
9 8 adantr ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 ∧ A ∈ Fin → < 𝑸 Or A
10 simpr ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 ∧ A ∈ Fin → A ∈ Fin
11 prn0 ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → A ≠ ∅
12 11 adantr ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 ∧ A ∈ Fin → A ≠ ∅
13 fimax2g ⊢ < 𝑸 Or A ∧ A ∈ Fin ∧ A ≠ ∅ → ∃ x ∈ A ∀ y ∈ A ¬ x < 𝑸 y
14 9 10 12 13 syl3anc ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 ∧ A ∈ Fin → ∃ x ∈ A ∀ y ∈ A ¬ x < 𝑸 y
15 ralnex ⊢ ∀ y ∈ A ¬ x < 𝑸 y ↔ ¬ ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
16 15 rexbii ⊢ ∃ x ∈ A ∀ y ∈ A ¬ x < 𝑸 y ↔ ∃ x ∈ A ¬ ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
17 rexnal ⊢ ∃ x ∈ A ¬ ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y ↔ ¬ ∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
18 16 17 bitri ⊢ ∃ x ∈ A ∀ y ∈ A ¬ x < 𝑸 y ↔ ¬ ∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
19 14 18 sylib ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 ∧ A ∈ Fin → ¬ ∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
20 19 ex ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → A ∈ Fin → ¬ ∀ x ∈ A ∃ y ∈ A x < 𝑸 y
21 3 20 mt2d ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → ¬ A ∈ Fin
22 nelne1 ⊢ A ∈ V ∧ ¬ A ∈ Fin → V ≠ Fin
23 1 21 22 syl2anc ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → V ≠ Fin
24 23 necomd ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → Fin ≠ V
25 fineqv ⊢ ¬ ω ∈ V ↔ Fin = V
26 25 necon1abii ⊢ Fin ≠ V ↔ ω ∈ V
27 24 26 sylib ⊢ A ∈ 𝑷 → ω ∈ V