Description: Lemma 2.27 of JonesMatijasevic p. 697; rmY is a diophantine relation. 0 was excluded from the range of B and the lower limit of G was imposed because the source proof does not seem to work otherwise; quite possible I'm just missing something. The source proof uses both i and I; i has been changed to j to avoid collision. This theorem is basically nothing but substitution instances, all the work is done in jm2.27a and jm2.27c . Once Diophantine relations have been defined, the content of the theorem is "rmY is Diophantine". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | jm2.27 | |